As a result, there is no point in spamming comments. We post comments ourselves from time to time, and seeing that the article has changed, Google increases the ranking. I think the same happens when you update the article.
Aynen öyle. Ben sitelerimde geriye düşen içeriklerimi sürekli güncelliyorum ki, ana sayfada kalabileyim.
I used Yorumplus but on a movie site. It was quite good actually, I think it’s worth trying; I don’t know how it is on a normal site, I haven’t tried it yet, but it’s a nice plugin and the credits are cheap too. Give it a try.
-
Let’s say we are going to get a link, how do you analyze this link in-depth? (results like impact on us + score + risk etc.)
I look at the quality of the site, its relevance to my site, the number of outbound links, its traffic, etc. etc. You fill in these "etc."s, please
I made a start, as you improve your SEO knowledge, you add criteria to that “etc.” part -
How do you remove harmful or harmless links on your site?
It varies by sector; if there is a chance of getting negative SEO in the sector, I examine my own links using backlink query tools from time to time. I download all links from Ahrefs etc. Then I check if there is any trash. Otherwise, I’ve never had a site hit by spam, but one day I want to build a site that gets caught by spam or an update by my own hand. That’s why I never did it (removing harmful links etc.).
It didn’t take me that long to switch to PC, I forgot the topic, managing 3 forums at the same time is hard wmaraci r10 seocry 
ellerine sağlık hocam geliştirmek lazım kendimizi
Google cannot see IPs; if it wanted to, it could, but this is simply not legal, so its hands are tied and it cannot intervene in that aspect even if it wanted to.
Getting Comments: Those folks did that kind of collaboration to get original and relevant comments, which is the main important thing. Pulling from X-site and publishing comments on Y-site will lead Google to understand this in the long run, just like it understands duplicate articles.
Getting relevant and quality backlinks is important;
The ratio of linked/unlinked text and articles of the site from which you will get a backlink.
How many backlinks it gives to authoritative sites in the articles (for instance, if the article is about torrents, did it link out to Torrent Freak or not)
The quality of the content, these are important things. However; saying “give the money you would spend on a Backlink to a promotional article instead” is also a mistake; there is a phenomenon we call link juice, meaning the more quality and diverse your backlinks are, the more useful they are (provided you do not overdo it). So a PROPER article that you will publish on Ezine Articles, where you would get a promotional article, can bring you more; for example, you can use alternative sources like Slideshare or Github.
So I don’t understand this promotional article madness and the eagerness to overuse it; seriously, in many places, promotional articles taken from irrelevant sites harm the sites more; moreover, everyone’s blog network is not that high quality, and besides, for the money asked for very high-quality networks, you could create a blog network sufficient to handle your job yourself.