Hello friends;
Most of us know about satellite blogs and tiered link networks. Is it still beneficial after the recent updates?
If we set up 10 satellite blogs, scan old books to create content, build up unique articles, and feed the main site, would it benefit the main site? In short, do you think it is worth all this effort?
I would appreciate answers to the best of your knowledge. Thanks in advance for your answers.
These things don’t work with just content; it makes sense to build up the buffer site like a normal site, do bookmarking, and get links 
It definitely has an effect.
Now, master, here is the situation.
People confuse bridge pages with doorway pages a bit. Pages created solely to link to another page without any content are bridge pages and are now ineffective or harmful.
Doorway pages, however, have content, and as long as they are like a main site, there is no problem.
Google explained its affiliate policy.
Sites opened to promote a product or service are called affiliate sites.
The duty of these sites should be to provide introductory information or product reviews for the product or service in question. That is, they must be useful.
When I say acting like a main site, not everyone is bookmarking their main site. Not everyone is getting backlinks. These are not the issue. The issue is to truly make this doorway site useful in the eyes of Google.
If we do not link out from the doorway site we have made valuable in the first stage, but do so after 1 month, and if the first links go to authorities, the doorway sites actually become sites that someone else opened for affiliate marketing.
A system I never liked Opening dummy sites, entering articles, etc. etc. Instead of that, I can progress faster by getting promotional posts.
[quote=“eyupoglu, post:4, topic:1119”]
A system I really don’t like Instead of opening dummy sites, entering articles, etc.,
I think 10 buffer sites treated like a main site, with regular original content added for 4 months and then gradually providing backlinks to the main site, will be very beneficial. It is a difficult strategy, not an easy one, and I think the difficulty makes it valuable.
I open a Blogspot, post 4 pieces of content in a week, then I definitely find 1 or 2 promotional toplist sites in the search. Then I add an outbound link to my own site. Back in the day, I ranked blog.com and Blogspot for keywords like glass balcony and car rental 
It lasted 3 months, then it got hit by the update.
There is something misunderstood here. Look at what we are saying: a normal site. How many sites do you think have social media accounts? How many sites have fine-tuned SEO settings? So, Google and other analytics operations measure and evaluate data and produce a graph. For instance, what is the time between the site opening and the social media opening? How SEO-friendly is the site? How much content is entered in the first week on general sites? They measure things we wouldn’t even think of, and from there, they understand who is fake and who is real.
Of course, the final point is put by the content. If the content is solid, there is favor. But don’t forget, naturalness comes from being natural. Not from rote. Is social media not beneficial? Of course, it is beneficial. However, when we say naturalness, there is no need to stand out too much. Take a look at smaller sectors. For example, look at the websites of companies selling eggs or nylon. How did they do it? What did they do? Being natural does not happen by treating every site the same. What I have discussed here are just examples.
Main idea: Naturalness is not rote. There is no procedure for naturalness.
By the way, don’t worry about unique content. My program is finished, and we did the initial tests. It’s good right now. You can generate dozens from one spun article. Most importantly, while the spun article tools on the market do it randomly, the ones coming out of our program will always be 80% and above. It works. Don’t worry, I’m not thinking of selling it right now. Free for forum friends Of course, for the first 3 months. Good luck
I wrote an article about the feeder blog system the other day, I hope it helps: http://www.seonostra.com/paravan-blog/
If you don’t spam, you will benefit from every site where you are helpful to people. Do not go overboard with feeder blogs, be natural and produce quality content, that’s it.
:eek: I think it’s unnecessary. o_O
------------------:p----------------------------
Guys, I have finished the program I mentioned just now. I can provide the unique versions of the articles to those who send spun articles. I am currently feeding a site with only
Well done, boss. I had heard that you would give the program to members on the forum for free for the first 3 months. How can we benefit from this service until the system is settled initially? I would appreciate it if you provide a page or email address where we can send the articles, well done again.
If by buffer sites you mean WordPress or Blogger sites, I think the healthiest approach is to put your effort into domains that belong to you but are registered under different names. At one point, I lost pages I opened on WordPress, presumably due to excessive advertising on social media. Consequently, my efforts went to waste, and I couldn’t get them back. However, if it had been a self-hosted site, you could simply redirect, and the domains would remain in your hands; in short, I am of the opinion that you hold the reins and can act accordingly. That is my view, but don’t forget that you need to allocate a certain budget for this. By the way, if the accounts are under different people and hosted on different servers, you will have built your own backlink network in the true sense.
Actually, at first I said I would make the program in PHP and open a panel for forum members, but my programmer friend couldn’t do PHP so he made a desktop one. At this stage, send me the spun articles via email and I will provide feedback.
The measure of uniqueness is also in your hands. Like this:
{word 1|word 2|word 3}
If you prepare an article with 3 words in each position in this format
9, 27, 81, 243, 729
articles are produced. You will appreciate that 9 articles will be more solid than 729 articles. This depends on your preference.
For myself, I do it as a set of 4:
{word 1|word 2|word 3|word 4}
The results become
16, 64, 256, 1024.
I use 256. So if I need 1000 articles, I immediately write 4 spun texts. (It takes 1 week)
then I throw the writings into WP. I schedule them for every half hour. The index speed of the site I gave above dropped below half an hour. It will drop even further.
For a buffer blog, of course, your own domain would be the best, but think about it. After printing spun articles, you have no content issues. You can easily open 5 buffer blogs daily.
As seen, the site where spun articles were published is currently inaccessible. So, I understand this: drop the spinning business, bro. In my view, a proper 50-100 words is better than a 500-word spun article.
However, there is still a question that remains unclear. The question asked by @aykant was left hanging.
If [a site] were fed with 3-4 articles of 500-600 words every week, scanned from old books to ensure uniqueness (unrelated to the main site), and 3-5 unique images were added to the texts… and after 1 month, a link was placed to the main site for the relevant keyword via a promotional article, would it be beneficial?
Which site isn’t opening, boss? What does the site not opening have to do with spun articles?
If three proper blogs were opened and maintained, it would be nice together with Özgü. Buying expired old domains from GoDaddy and turning them into blogs produces good results