Don't Let Them Fool You With SEO-Friendly Article Lies

Hello SEOCry members,

Since this forum is generally used for tools and similar operations, there are usually people here who are knowledgeable about the subject. However, many people remain neutral towards such things. Therefore, I prepared a short video for everyone, both those who know and those who don’t, to learn and review. It is my first video; the quality is low but the purpose is great.

For those who cannot watch this video, the text version: SEO Compatible Article

You explained it beautifully and enlightened

**“Lies About SEO-Friendly Articles” **I wondered, is he posting this title without knowing the job? I assumed he posted this title because he lacks knowledge about SEO-friendly articles. I examined the content briefly. Frankly, regarding SEO-friendly articles, I noticed your incomplete and incorrect explanations. I’d say don’t mislead people. I agree with some of what you explained regarding SEO and suitable articles, but the rest is just full of misinformation…

Come on bro, is there really such a thing as an “SEO-friendly” version of an article? Look, what you call an SEO-friendly article is simply 300 words or more, with the keyword appearing within the first 100 words, internal linking for some important terms, and using plenty of italics. Even an article writer who doesn’t understand SEO does this. For an article to be SEO-friendly, the site content itself needs to be SEO-friendly, with H tags, etc., etc.

It looks great, thanks.