Guys, when setting up these satellite sites, there are IP classifications like Class A, Class B, etc. I’m not knowledgeable about this subject. So, would it be a problem if I set up all my satellite sites on a reseller account?
[quote=“elegan, post:1, topic:925”]
Guys, when setting up these dummy sites, there are IP classifications like A class, B class, etc. I am not knowledgeable
I understand, so if I install it on a reseller, would it be a problem? If so, what kind of problem would it be?
The logic is to use PBN sites on different IP addresses to trick search engines.
There is also talk about A-B-C class IPs.
For example, if the IP addresses you get are from the same series, it is said to be useless again.
xx,xxx,xxx,111
xx,xxx,xxx,112
xx,xxx,xxx,113
I have never used it on a reseller hosting so I don’t know, but you can buy a VDS and IP addresses and apply this process.
I’ve seen people using different IP addresses but the same AdSense or Webmaster Tools account.
If the PBN sites were previously on the same IP address, it is necessary to research whether changing them now would do any good.
If you are going to apply this process, research it thoroughly.
I have never used PBN sites myself. I just know such a thing exists from what I’ve read here and there.
These are the things I know, whether right or wrong.
Take it easy.
Thanks, but I need clear information. I will treat the blogs as main sites, develop them, and build links between them. I mean, can’t a person have dozens of sites on the same server?
A person may have dozens of websites on the same server, but they cannot exert an influence to boost each other.
Is this certain @okursan?
I think the need for a buffer can be met by purchasing hosting from different hosting providers.
Additionally, services like Blogger and WordPress.com can also be used.
111.111.111.111
a . b . c .
So the first numbers are called A class, the 2nd part B class, and the 3rd part C class IP.
I even built outbound links on sites I manage through the same analytics account and did not encounter any issues. I do not think Google will obsess over this IP issue; if link building is done carefully from non-spammy and well-crafted sites, I do not think there will be any problems. Google, or more broadly search engines, is aware of how many different websites of how many different clients are hosted on a single machine. They are also aware that hosting and IP changes are made when sites are bought and sold. Taking these into consideration, I do not think they will mistreat a site just because it is coming from the same IP. A lot of site trading is done through intra-company transfers. How many people among us allocate a dedicated machine for a single site?
But these are my personal opinions. If there are friends who have experienced negative effects, I would like to hear your experiences.
You can also have hundreds of sites on the same server, as long as they have **different IP addresses **.
I also think you should get hosting from different hosting companies for each site without getting involved with C class or A class IPs. It might be a bit costly compared to a reseller or VDS, but in today’s conditions, a VDS comes with 1 IP address, and each additional IP address you request can already be more expensive than a yearly hosting fee (averaging 50 TL per year). But of course, you can’t fool Uncle Google just by showing different IPs. Details like IP addresses, WHOIS information, and Webmaster Tools accounts also need to be different. There are many more factors, of course.
Sir, I think that instead of trying to trick Google here, it would be much more valuable, and naturally a better backlink, if we provide links for the sake of reference. Let’s not kid ourselves; as a search engine, we are facing perhaps the most advanced algorithm in the world, and it is updated every minute. No matter what sneaky stuff we try to pull, Google will eventually slap us in the face. Why do you think people who do Black Hat SEO end up losing? They always leave a loophole somewhere, and Google slaps them. When a useful site links to another useful site, I don’t think Google would look for a catch in that. Because we are working within a system that can distinguish exactly what is what.
First of all, if a person doesn’t fall for this, Google certainly won’t either. Then again, others may have many sites. For example, a digital agency adds its signature, and consequently its link, to the bottom of the sites it builds. The purpose of this is the same as in this topic. However, this is done as a signature of their work, so that someone visiting that site might see it and become a customer.
On the other hand, the owner of an interesting project “usually” doesn’t have many sites. Or even if they do, they already allocate at least 1 server to each of their sites. For example, Twitter.
The owners of such sites are not trying to promote game, image, or joke sites like we are.
For this reason, we have to be a bit more meticulous. Ultimately, our technical and financial resources are limited, at least perhaps for now.
Wishing success for everyone’s projects.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk