The topic can be deleted.
It is more accurate to base the quality factor on time on site instead of bounce rate. If I find very satisfying 2,000-word information on the topic I am looking for, I might leave the site without visiting another page, but I will still be happy because I found what I was looking for.
Bounce rate means that the user does not visit any other page besides the one they entered the site on. Of course, that is also an important factor, but the factors that truly determine a site’s quality are time on site, return rate,
Of course, that’s true. Actually, what I meant by bounce rate there is, as you said, the time spent on the site, and whether a comment was made or not. In short, the reactions of the visitors. It was good of you to point this out, I will correct it.
So let’s say we opened a site like this and, with our effort, published a single article of about 1000 words every day. How much time would need to pass for us to get somewhere?
This completely depends on the industry.
Is there an industry you have in mind that is solely content-based? If you provide an example, it will lead to a higher quality and better result.
It might be possible to rank higher with content alone. However, what the content is about and even the title of the content are of great importance. By researching the market in that sector, it is necessary to produce content parallel to an appropriate title. Subsequently, I believe the growth rate will be even faster with the marketing of the content…
I am wondering about this too.
Unfortunately, I don’t have an example site.